This week, Charles Savage's focus shifts to something more enduring - the builders who continue to create through uncertainty.

Summary

1. Markets feel tense, but they’re holding.
   Oil is near $100 and rate cuts are further out, yet investors are protecting downside rather than exiting.
   
   
2. Most of the real movement is happening quietly.
   While everyone watches war and the Fed, capital is still flowing into AI, infrastructure, and platforms that will shape the next decade.
   
   
3. The people creating value are already moving.
   By the time conditions feel comfortable, most of the upside has already been taken. The early moves happen in uncertain moments like this.
   
   
4. The question isn’t what markets will do next.
   It’s whether you’re positioned for what’s being built while they figure it out.

From Charles

The world is loud right now.

War. Oil. Fear. A Fed in an impossible position.

And yet, in the middle of all of it, I found myself this week thinking about builders.

Elon Musk standing in a converted power plant in Austin announcing a $25 billion chip factory.

Dr Taddy Blecher. Who turned down a lucrative US career in 1995 to drive into a Johannesburg township and never look back. Launching the next chapter of the Maharishi Invincibility Institute.

And David Frankel. Who built Africa's largest ISP from nothing, sold it, went to Harvard, and then became one of the world's great venture investors. Standing up at the MMIT launch last week and saying, in front of a room full of people, that Taddy Blecher is the greatest entrepreneur he has ever seen.

That is extraordinary praise. From a man who was an early investor in Uber. I keep coming back to it.

Because the world wants you to focus on everything that is going wrong.

And there is plenty.

But the builders do not wait for the noise to stop.They build anyway.

The Week That Was

Oil hit $100 again.

The escalation continued. US forces struck Kharg Island, Iran's main oil export hub. Retaliation struck oil infrastructure at Fujairah in the UAE, disrupting loadings at one of the region’s key export hubs outside the Strait. The IEA convened emergency meetings. The Fed met on Wednesday.

The probability of recession rises every day oil stays here.

And yet the Fed, as expected, held rates at 3.50% to 3.75%. The official 2026 projection was broadly unchanged, but there was clear movement among some participants toward fewer cuts. What had been priced as a June cut is now a December cut at best. Some economists are no longer ruling out a hike.

The word nobody wants to say out loud is stagflation.

Weakening growth. Sticky inflation. A central bank with nowhere comfortable to go. Markets are holding. Barely. But the setup is fragile.

The Deadline That Wasn't

This morning, as we publish, the Trump deadline has passed.

Or rather, it hasn't. Trump extended it by five days, citing "very good and productive conversations" with Iran and hinting at a "complete and total resolution."

Iran's state television ran a graphic within the hour: "US president backs down following Iran's firm warning."

That tells you everything you need to know about the incentive structure here.

Iran did not start this war. Their supreme leader was killed in the opening strikes. Throughout the 48-hour deadline window, they kept firing missiles at Kuwait, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Israel. That is not a negotiating partner looking for an off-ramp. That is a regime fighting for survival and legitimacy.

So ask the simple question: what does Iran gain by reopening the Strait?

Every day it stays closed, oil at $100 bleeds the global economy, embarrasses the US, and hands Tehran leverage it has never had before. Why give that away for a five-day extension and a Truth Social post?

Iran has shown no capacity for reconciliation with Trump across decades of engagement. There is no precedent, no trust, and no incentive to start now.

The TACO trade argues that Trump always finds an exit. Maybe. But this time the other side has read the playbook too.

The five-day extension is not diplomacy. It is a delay. Watch what happens to oil if that window closes without progress.

The Inspiration to Dream Bigger

Watching the builders this week did something to me.

It reminded me to keep building. And to dream bigger.

There is an investor and writer called Meb Faber who laid out four things America needs to do to close its wealth gap: teach money in schools early, give every citizen a stake in the market, copy Australia's mandatory savings system, and redesign the lottery as a savings vehicle.

He wrote it as a prescription for the US.

I read it as a mandate for South Africa.

Because every single one of those four things needs to happen here and nobody is waiting for government to do it. Not Taddy. Not Elon. And not us.

So let me be direct about where my head is.

Teach money in schools. We should own this. Financial literacy, real literacy, not theory, belongs in every South African classroom. If the curriculum will not move fast enough, we build around it.

Give every citizen a stake in the market. This is not a pipe dream. It is a product. A South African child, from the day they are born, owning a fractional piece of this country's greatest companies through a tax-free savings account. If Elon can announce a $25 billion chip factory and mean it, we can mean this.

Copy Australia's mandatory savings model. South Africa has a retirement crisis hiding in plain sight. Millions of people reaching the end of their working lives with nothing. The nudge is simple, make saving the default, not the exception. The technology to do this exists. The will is what is needed.

Redesign the lottery as a savings vehicle. South Africa's poorest households spend more on lottery tickets and betting every year than they save or invest.

We have effectively built a system that taxes hope and rewards luck.

Prize-linked savings flips that equation. Every rand saved earns a ticket. You keep your capital. The upside remains.

Same behaviour. Completely different outcome.

That is not policy. That is product.

I am not saying we will get all four right. I am saying that if we dream big enough, even a far miss gets these four plans closer to the moon than where they are today.

Taddy Blecher started with a photocopy of a keyboard and no building.

He has 24,000 graduates earning R1.4 billion in combined annual salaries.

Scale is a function of ambition, not resources.

So is the direction of travel in capital markets, and in the wealth they can create for people who have been locked out of them for too long.

With over 1.2 million EasyEquities clients and growing fast, everyone we need to meet to make things happen is already one connection away, or already here, waiting for us to raise a hand.

The network is already built. The question is whether we are bold enough to use it.

Elon Builds Anyway

On Saturday night in Austin, Elon Musk stood inside a converted power plant and announced Terafab, a joint chip fabrication initiative between Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, reportedly targeting tens of billions of dollars in investment.

The ambition is enormous. To produce computing capacity at a scale far beyond anything that exists today.

His framing was blunt: "We either build the Terafab or we do not have the chips. And we need the chips."

The existing global chip supply, from TSMC, Samsung, Micron, falls well short of what Musk believes his companies will require. Rather than wait for the industry to catch up, he is moving to build his own.

Is this achievable? Musk has no background in semiconductor manufacturing. He has a history of promising timelines that slip. The critics are already lining up and they are not wrong to ask the questions.

But here is the thing about Musk that his critics consistently underestimate.

He was told electric cars were not viable. He built them anyway.

He was told reusable rockets were impossible. He built them anyway.

Whether Terafab delivers on every dimension of its ambition is almost beside the point in the short term. What matters is the signal it sends about where AI infrastructure is heading and how fast.

The AI industrial era is not coming. It is here. And the supply chain for intelligence, chips, compute, energy, is the new oil.

Taddy Blecher Builds Differently

But Musk is not the builder who stayed with me most this week.

Last week I attended the launch of MMIT, the Maharishi Invincibility Institute's next chapter.

In one address, David Frankel, who co-founded Internet Solutions, Africa's largest ISP, and went on to become a founding investor in Uber, one of the most celebrated seed investors on the planet, seven times named to the Midas List, said that Taddy Blecher is the greatest entrepreneur he has ever seen.

Let that land.

Taddy Blecher is a South African actuary who, in 1995, turned down a lucrative US career. After driving through a Johannesburg township for the first time, he decided to spend the rest of his life there instead. He co-founded CIDA City Campus. The country's first free university. With no building, no money, no books, no computers, no teachers. He taught students to type using a photocopy of a keyboard.

He has since helped educate over 24,000 young South Africans. His graduates now earn a combined R1.4 billion in annual salaries. Their expected lifetime earnings: R59 billion. 70% of them are women. He did this not with government money, not with donor dependency, but with a model, learn and earn, where students fund their own education and that of those who come after them.

That is not philanthropy. That is entrepreneurship.

And the Maharishi Invincibility Institute is now on 13 campuses across five countries.

What David Frankel recognises, and what I recognise, is that Taddy Blecher has done something harder than building a unicorn.

He has built a model that compounds human capital.

In a world where the wealth gap is the defining fault line, that is a more important invention than most billion-dollar companies.

The Savage Take

I want to zoom out this week.

Yes, the macro is difficult. Oil at $100. Stagflation risk. A Fed caught between mandates. US credibility under pressure. The dollar and Treasuries beginning a slow, structural repricing.

But I have been at this long enough to know that the most important things that happen in markets are rarely the ones dominating the headlines.

The most important things are the structural shifts.

The erosion of US dominance as the world's capital anchor, and the rotation of liquidity that will follow, is a structural shift.

The AI infrastructure buildout, Nvidia's GTC, Elon's Terafab, Jensen Huang declaring AI is the new electricity, is a structural shift.

The democratisation of ownership, the idea that every South African child should own a piece of this country's greatest companies, that every human being deserves access to the compounding power of capital, is a structural shift.

And the builders, the Taddys and the Davids and, yes, even the Elons, are not waiting for the geopolitics to settle or the VIX to fall.

They are building anyway.

That is the only response that has ever mattered.

The future is not decided by conditions. It is decided by those who build through them.

So this week, let’s do what matters. Let’s invest in the builders.

Stay curious. Stay invested. Stay in the game.

Stay Savage.

Charles

So, When Do You Actually Sell Shares?

How to Spot Shares That Are on the Rise

How to Customise Your Viewing Experience on Easy 3.0

Why Defensive Stocks Can Be Your Best Bet for Stability and Income

7 Tips to Survive and Thrive During Market Uncertainties

Have You Tried These Saving Tips to Hit Your First R50,000?

Inside Our Team’s Top AI Basket Picks and Platform Features

Buying the Dip Doesn’t Mean Just One Thing

How to Create Powerful Prompts for AI Baskets on EasyEquities

Any opinions, news, research, reports, analyses, prices, or other information contained within this research is provided by an employee of EasyEquities an authorised FSP (FSP no 22588) as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice for the purposes of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002. First World Trader (Pty) Ltd t/a EasyEquities (“EasyEquities”) does not warrant the correctness, accuracy, timeliness, reliability or completeness of any information (i) contained within this research and (ii) received from third party data providers. You must rely solely upon your own judgment in all aspects of your investment and/or trading decisions and all investments and/or trades are made at your own risk. EasyEquities (including any of their employees) will not accept any liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage, including without limitation, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on the market commentary. The content contained within is subject to change at any time without notice.